This is a really thoughtful and interesting piece.
The most valuable practitioners I see emerging are not the ones with the most agents or the cleanest Markdown graph. They are the ones who know when to slow the system down, when to intervene and when to question the framing instead of refining the prompt.
You can introduce as many new tools as you want but if the intent is unclear, they simply scale confusion.
The practitioners who thrive will not be the ones who chase every new capability. They will be the ones who design calm, coherent systems that think with them, not instead of them.
Agreed. At the moment, for example, I would not invest in Clawdbot: it poses a high security risk most enthusiastic amateurs are not aware of, and Claude Cowork can cover 80-90 % of the reported use cases anyway.
This is a really thoughtful and interesting piece.
The most valuable practitioners I see emerging are not the ones with the most agents or the cleanest Markdown graph. They are the ones who know when to slow the system down, when to intervene and when to question the framing instead of refining the prompt.
You can introduce as many new tools as you want but if the intent is unclear, they simply scale confusion.
The practitioners who thrive will not be the ones who chase every new capability. They will be the ones who design calm, coherent systems that think with them, not instead of them.
Agreed. At the moment, for example, I would not invest in Clawdbot: it poses a high security risk most enthusiastic amateurs are not aware of, and Claude Cowork can cover 80-90 % of the reported use cases anyway.