The Agile Prompt Engineering Framework

A Structured Approach Explicitly Designed for Agile Practitioners.

Mar 20, 2025

Hello everyone!

Agile teams have always sought ways to work smarter without compromising their principles. Many have begun experimenting with new technologies, frameworks, or practices to enhance their way of working. Still, they often struggle to get relevant, actionable results that address their specific challenges. Regarding generative AI, there is a better way for agile practitioners than reinventing the wheel team by team — the Agile Prompt Engineering Framework.

Learn why it solves the challenge: a structured approach to prompting AI models designed specifically for agile practitioners who want to leverage this technology as a powerful ally in their journey.

🛑 Becoming obsolete is a choice, not inevitable!

👉 Don’t Miss Out — Join the Second Cohort: AI for Agile Practitioners: Pilot Cohort #2, May 14 to June 11, 2025, at € 199!

Why The Agile Prompt Engineering Framework Is Different

Most existing approaches to technology-assisted work lack the context-awareness and the human-centered focus that Agile requires. This prompting framework, however, changes that by applying core agile principles — iterative improvement, collaboration, and continuous adaptation — to these interactions. The result is not just high-quality, actionable prompts that help to solve everyday challenges all agile practitioners face. It is also a structured approach to broaden your mindset by learning to interact with new, defining technology for years to come.

👉 Download the Agile Prompt Engineering Framework here. It is free. 👈

A Practical, Tiered Framework You Can Start Using Today

What makes this prompting framework for agile practitioners immediately worthwhile is the tiered structure that allows you to implement it progressively:

🔴 Must-Have Elements (Core)

These five essential components will immediately improve your results:

Clarify the Agile Context: Provide specific details about team composition, Sprints, or known bottlenecks,
Define the Core Task or Goal: State clearly what you want to accomplish,
Assign Roles & Perspectives: Specify which Agile role to adopt,
Specify Output Format & Style: Define how you want information structured and presented,
Incorporate Real or Sample Data: Include actual metrics or examples from your team without violating governance rules.

Even implementing just these core elements can dramatically improve the quality and relevance of your results.

🟠 Should-Have Elements (Enhanced)

Once comfortable with the core elements, these additions significantly improve output quality:

Impose Constraints or Special Requirements: State limitations like time or resource constraints,
Ask for Iterations or Variations: Request multiple approaches to evaluate trade-offs,
Build a Feedback Loop: Treat interaction as a conversation, not a one-time request,
Prohibited Words or Phrases: Ban generic language for more authentic results.

🟢 Could-Have Elements (Advanced)

For optimal results in complex scenarios, integrate these sophisticated techniques:

Verify & Address Inaccuracies: Include fact-checking mechanisms,
Privacy & Ethics Guidelines: Establish boundaries for sensitive information,
Baked-In Collaboration Flow: Structure prompts to include pauses for human judgment.
Thanks for reading Hands-on Agile by Stefan Wolpers! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

How It Works in Practice

Imagine you’re a Scrum Master or Agile Coach facing tension between remote and in-office team members. Using this framework, you may structure your initial prompting approach like this:

<role>
You are an experienced Scrum Master or Agile Coach specializing in hybrid team dynamics, psychological safety, and conflict resolution.
</role>

<context>
- I facilitate a Scrum team with six developers, one PO, and one SM (me). • Three team members work remotely full-time, while four are in the office. 
- We've been using this hybrid model for two months.
- Our last two Retrospectives revealed tension between in-office and remote members. 
- Remote members feel left out of informal discussions, while in-office members feel remote colleagues aren't as engaged.
- Our Sprint performance is still stable, but team satisfaction scores are dropping.
</context>

<task>
Design a 60-minute Retrospective format to address the remote/in-office divide and strengthen team cohesion regardless of location.
</task>

<constraints>
- Both remote and in-office participants must be engaged equally.
- Should address underlying tensions without creating blame.
- Time limit: 60 minutes total.
- Available tools are Miro, Zoom, and Slack.
- One remote team member has an unreliable internet connection.
</constraints>

<outputFormat>
Provide:
1. A detailed timeline with specific activities and timeboxes.
2. Required preparation steps.
3. Facilitation notes for each activity.
4. Guidance on managing potentially difficult moments.
5. Techniques to ensure balanced participation.
</outputFormat>

This structured approach yields a detailed, contextually relevant Retrospective design tailored to your situation, which you can start iterating on until you find a helpful Retrospective format.

Thanks for reading Hands-on Agile by Stefan Wolpers! This post is public so feel free to share it.

How to Make the Agile Prompt Engineering Framework Work for You

The most straightforward way to start using the Agile prompt engineering framework is iteratively and incrementally — no pun intended:

Progressive Improvement Through Measurement

The framework also includes practical metrics to help you evaluate and improve your results:

Relevance Score (1–5): How well did the output address your specific context?
Actionability (1–5): Could you implement the suggestions without significant additional work?
Time Savings: How much time did you save compared to traditional approaches?

By tracking these metrics, you can continuously improve your effectiveness.

Start Simple, Grow Your Skills

You don’t need to implement everything at once:

Start today: Use just the Must-Have elements for your next Retrospective approach.
Next week: Add constraints and output format specifications for more refined results.
As you gain comfort: Explore the more advanced techniques outlined in the complete framework.

The Full Framework Is Yours, Free

The complete Agile Prompt Engineering Framework includes:

All 12 framework elements across three tiers,
Complete examples for multiple Agile scenarios,
A practical worksheet to build prompts yourself,
Troubleshooting guide for common prompting challenges,
Model-specific considerations for different tools.

I created this framework in collaboration with Holger Dierssen. It represents a thoughtful approach to integrating new technologies into practices while preserving the human-centered values at the heart of Agile.

👉 Download the Agile Prompt Engineering Framework here. It is free. 👈

🛑 Becoming obsolete is a choice, not inevitable!

👉 Don’t Miss Out — Join the Second Cohort: AI for Agile Practitioners: Pilot Cohort #2, May 14 to June 11, 2025, at € 199!